Before going to the Taj Mahal, I was told by many people
that Agra, the town in which it resides, was not a great place.
It’s usually said with the same tone of voice you hear about
so many destinations and their contexts. Despite the tolerance and
openmindedness universities are supposed to instill, town gown relations
inevitably involve diminutive expressions like “townies,” and a whole of
buts The University of Chicago is
great....but Hyde Park is dangerous.
Notre Dame is beautiful….but South Bend sucks. Why does Disney World have to be in Orlando? Visiting
the Pyramids would be better if it weren’t for, you know, Egypt…
It’s not that there’s nothing to this. I have exactly 0 desire to live in Orlando. I
wouldn’t probably have chosen to live in South Bend or Hyde Park if not for my
educational choices. But I can’t help
feeling that there’s always a certain undertone of disdain, for lack of a better
word, for local residents that always makes me a little uncomfortable.
The tourist industry complies with consumer preferences for
beauty without a downside. They provide luxury hotels, onsite properties,
private transport, and often employ migrant staff from different countries or
regions that minimize the amount of interaction seekers of beauty, thrills, and
photo-worthy vistas have to have with the population at large. And the cost of enjoying the attraction are
often so prohibitive that neighbors cannot possibly afford to take advantage.
But the divide between destinations and their settings not
realistic or genuine. There is a historical reason
why attractions and there environments are as they are; they have evolved in
tandem. In some cases, surrounding areas reflect a wider regional social/economic
context. In others, I suspect that the competitiveness endemic to the tourism
area has driven wages down, even as prices increase, leading to a more
impoverished areas that would otherwise exist.
Photo credit: My roommate |
I’m impossibly obsessed with seeing and
understanding the world as it is.
And so, in Agra, I kept my eyes open. It certainly isn’t a pretty town unto
itself. The market areas felt like Juba
and the hostels and harassment reminded me of Cairo and Luxor. It’s certainly a microcosm of a lot of India, and a side I don’t see traveling
to and from work or touring in New Delhi. During my
less than 24 hours in Agra, I saw some real life alongside all that white marble.
I saw a sad river desperately in need of rain, nomadic
herders, small-scale agricultural workers living in grass huts, and from a distance,
slums. I saw too-skinny children, malnourished horses, cows and other creatures. I looked away
from beggars, giving away a little bit of my humanity but none of my change as
I considered whether I would be genuinely helping or hurting them.
Just a few yards down from the Taj Mahal, I saw from across
the river what I am 90% sure was a series of funeral pyres on which Hindus were
being ritually cremated before, probably, being scattered in the river. I saw a
body, wrapped in a sheet being carried towards the river on a stretcher,
presumably for the same end. In short, I
saw, but couldn't hope to understand or engage with people living some
of the more difficult pieces of life in the shadow of one of the most-visited,
most beautiful attractions in the world.
In my effort to understand, it's tempting to get caught up in pity, romanticism, or other false projections of my preconceptions onto what I saw....I've already done that enough. But I keep reminding myself that I only had a brief glance into a window into others' lives. No more. What I saw does (and should) provide a little more food for thought as to my place in India and how my choices might affect others, although few good answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment